Stabilized Net Ratings for 2-man through 5-man lineups, blending raw results with team quality and player impact priors.
Click any lineup to see player details
Teams with the most lineups in the top 20 by Stabilized Net Rating
Offensive vs Defensive Rating (top 100 lineups by minutes). Upper-right = elite.
| # | Lineup | Team | MIN | ORTG | DRTG | NET | STAB ↓ | CONF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OKC | 165 | 121.7 | 101.5 | Medium | |||
| 2 | CHA | 384 | 134.7 | 107.9 | High | |||
| 3 | SAS | 217 | 124.3 | 106.5 | Medium | |||
| 4 | DEN | 237 | 122.2 | 107.8 | Medium | |||
| 5 | SAS | 131 | 132.8 | 115.2 | Low | |||
| 6 | ATL | 254 | 125.1 | 97.5 | Medium | |||
| 7 | DEN | 171 | 136.7 | 116.6 | Medium | |||
| 8 | BOS | 197 | 123.2 | 105.0 | Medium | |||
| 9 | SAS | 131 | 116.7 | 104.4 | Low | |||
| 10 | DET | 515 | 120.9 | 109.1 | High | |||
| 11 | LAL | 174 | 117.8 | 109.5 | Medium | |||
| 12 | PHI | 144 | 123.5 | 113.8 | Low | |||
| 13 | TOR | 320 | 124.2 | 113.2 | Medium | |||
| 14 | BOS | 192 | 116.8 | 114.4 | Medium | |||
| 15 | ORL | 126 | 120.1 | 106.1 | Low | |||
| 16 | HOU | 347 | 122.0 | 113.1 | Medium | |||
| 17 | HOU | 269 | 115.1 | 107.8 | Medium | |||
| 18 | MIN | 710 | 118.8 | 110.9 | Very High | |||
| 19 | NYK | 417 | 113.7 | 109.8 | High | |||
| 20 | ORL | 151 | 123.4 | 107.5 | Low | |||
| 21 | PHI | 153 | 119.4 | 108.5 | Low | |||
| 22 | LAC | 303 | 115.9 | 113.4 | Medium | |||
| 23 | ATL | 129 | 120.6 | 115.5 | Low | |||
| 24 | MIL | 173 | 120.6 | 109.4 | Medium | |||
| 25 | PHX | 266 | 114.8 | 104.9 | Medium | |||
| 26 | TOR | 157 | 110.4 | 106.2 | Low | |||
| 27 | ORL | 228 | 110.2 | 105.3 | Medium | |||
| 28 | ATL | 304 | 117.9 | 115.2 | Medium | |||
| 29 | HOU | 160 | 112.5 | 117.8 | Low | |||
| 30 | ORL | 175 | 116.2 | 107.0 | Medium | |||
| 31 | MIA | 142 | 113.9 | 115.3 | Low | |||
| 32 | ATL | 189 | 101.7 | 105.6 | Medium | |||
| 33 | LAL | 226 | 115.4 | 120.9 | Medium | |||
| 34 | POR | 150 | 114.2 | 116.9 | Low | |||
| 35 | POR | 137 | 118.6 | 120.7 | Low | |||
| 36 | GSW | 125 | 113.5 | 119.9 | Low | |||
| 37 | PHI | 125 | 111.7 | 113.4 | Low | |||
| 38 | NOP | 139 | 115.8 | 120.7 | Low | |||
| 39 | MIL | 169 | 114.6 | 123.6 | Medium | |||
| 40 | BKN | 307 | 116.7 | 114.5 | Medium | |||
| 41 | UTA | 179 | 109.8 | 118.2 | Medium | |||
| 42 | MIL | 132 | 102.8 | 110.7 | Low | |||
| 43 | BKN | 143 | 108.0 | 132.6 | Low | |||
| 44 | SAC | 130 | 99.3 | 121.4 | Low |
Raw lineup stats are notoriously noisy — a 5-man group with +25 Net Rating in 80 minutes might just be lucky. Stabilized Net Rating blends the raw data with an intelligent prior (based on team strength and individual player impact) to produce a more reliable estimate. The more minutes a lineup plays together, the more we trust the raw numbers.
Stabilized = w × RawNet + (1-w) × Prior
Where weight w = minutes / (minutes + 300)
At 300 minutes, we trust raw data and prior equally (50/50).
Our "expected" rating before seeing any data, built from:
Lineup data has extreme variance. A +30 Net Rating in 50 minutes is almost certainly luck, not skill. Stabilization pulls outliers toward realistic expectations while still rewarding strong performance.