🏆Hometown Heroes Tournament — Vote for your city!

Home PlayersDonovan Clingan

Donovan Clingan

Portland Trail Blazers

Birthdate:

2/23/2004 (21)

Position:

C

Primary Role:

Secondary Role:

Defensive Role:

Rim Protector

Height:

7'2"

Weight:

282

Wingspan:

7'7"

Positional Size:

A

Hometown:

Bristol, CT

Donovan Clingan Stats

Traditional
Advanced
Per 36
Plus Minus
Game Logs

Season	GP	MPG	FGM - FGA	FG%	3PM - 3PA	3P%	FTM - FTA	FT%	REB	APG	STL	BLK	PF	TOV	PTS
2025	67	19.8	2.7 - 5	53.9	0.2 - 0.7	28.6	0.9 - 1.6	59.6	7.9	1.1	0.5	1.6	2.8	1.1	6.5
2026	44	27.5 ↑	4.4 - 8.3 ↑	52.5 ↓	0.9 - 3 ↑	30.0 ↑	1.7 - 2.5 ↑	66.4 ↑	11.2 ↑	1.9 ↑	0.5 –	1.3 ↓	2.4 ↓	1 ↓	11.3 ↑
Career	111	22.8	3.4 - 6.3	53.1	0.5 - 1.6	29.6	1.2 - 1.9	63.1	9.2	1.5	0.5	1.5	2.6	1.1	8.4

Season	MP	TS%	3PAR	FTR	SQ	BOXCR	OLOAD	PR	PORT	VERS	CWARP	VORP
2025	1324	57.4	14.7	31.1	20.9	1.3	19.8	26	1.4	7	2.14	0.6
2026	1095	61.4	36	32.9	23.9	2	23.3	41	2.8	8.5	2.43	1.1

Season	MP	COPM	CDPM	CPM	ODARKO	DDARKO	DARKO	ODRIP	DDRIP	DRIP	OBPM	DBPM	BPM
2025	1324	-1.7	2.5	0.8	-2.1	1	-1	-2	2.2	0.2	-1.7	1.4	-0.3
2026	1095	0.1 72%	1.9 94%	2 89%	-1.1	1.4	0.3	-0.3	1.6	1.3	2.1	-0.3	1.8

Date	Opp	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	GmSc	FGM	FGA	FG%	3PM	3PA	3P%	FTM	FTA	FT%	ORB	DRB	TOV	PF	+/-
Jan 27, 2026	WAS	30	14	20	2	1	1	16.8	6	17	35.3%	0	3	0.0%	2	2	100.0%	13	7	2	3	-17
Jan 26, 2026	BOS	28	9	15	1	0	5	11.8	4	9	44.4%	1	5	20.0%	0	2	0.0%	4	11	3	2	-19
Jan 23, 2026	TOR	29	13	16	2	3	0	16.8	6	14	42.9%	1	4	25.0%	0	0	—	8	8	0	3	0
Jan 22, 2026	MIA	27	7	8	2	0	1	9.9	3	4	75.0%	1	2	50.0%	0	0	—	2	6	1	1	+12
Jan 18, 2026	SAC	37	21	17	3	0	1	25.8	6	9	66.7%	1	2	50.0%	8	8	100.0%	4	13	1	1	+17
Jan 17, 2026	LAL	27	18	11	4	0	0	15.9	7	14	50.0%	1	7	14.3%	3	5	60.0%	2	9	1	2	+16
Jan 15, 2026	ATL	28	9	12	1	0	0	8.5	3	8	37.5%	0	3	0.0%	3	7	42.9%	6	6	1	2	-8
Jan 13, 2026	GSW	22	7	9	1	0	0	7.9	2	3	66.7%	1	2	50.0%	2	2	100.0%	1	8	3	1	-7
Jan 11, 2026	NYK	30	8	8	1	0	2	10.3	3	6	50.0%	0	2	0.0%	2	2	100.0%	4	4	1	1	-23
Jan 9, 2026	HOU	33	8	15	6	2	1	14.7	3	9	33.3%	0	4	0.0%	2	2	100.0%	5	10	2	2	+8
Jan 7, 2026	HOU	31	12	7	3	0	1	13.0	5	9	55.6%	2	6	33.3%	0	0	—	1	6	0	0	-1
Jan 5, 2026	UTA	33	12	17	2	0	3	15.5	5	9	55.6%	2	4	50.0%	0	0	—	5	12	4	3	+11
Jan 3, 2026	SAS	34	24	12	4	0	0	24.8	9	12	75.0%	3	5	60.0%	3	6	50.0%	6	6	0	5	+1
Jan 2, 2026	NOP	30	11	15	1	0	1	14.3	5	10	50.0%	0	3	0.0%	1	2	50.0%	9	6	0	2	+15
Dec 31, 2025	OKC	17	6	5	0	0	0	4.0	2	5	40.0%	1	2	50.0%	1	2	50.0%	2	3	1	2	-29
Dec 29, 2025	DAL	29	18	11	1	0	0	18.6	8	10	80.0%	2	4	50.0%	0	0	—	4	7	0	3	-2
Dec 28, 2025	BOS	34	18	18	1	0	0	20.7	8	10	80.0%	1	3	33.3%	1	2	50.0%	7	11	2	3	-4
Dec 26, 2025	LAC	25	10	8	4	0	0	12.1	3	5	60.0%	3	3	100.0%	1	2	50.0%	3	5	1	3	+5
Dec 23, 2025	ORL	34	8	14	1	1	2	9.7	4	8	50.0%	0	0	—	0	0	—	3	11	2	5	0
Dec 22, 2025	DET	34	17	10	2	0	3	20.7	6	8	75.0%	2	2	100.0%	3	6	50.0%	5	5	0	1	+1
Dec 20, 2025	SAC	30	14	14	0	1	2	16.9	6	7	85.7%	1	1	100.0%	1	3	33.3%	3	11	2	2	+13
Dec 18, 2025	SAC	35	19	8	4	0	2	18.5	6	9	66.7%	2	4	50.0%	5	13	38.5%	5	3	1	4	+11
Dec 14, 2025	GSW	22	3	10	3	1	3	9.1	1	3	33.3%	0	1	0.0%	1	2	50.0%	3	7	1	2	-9
Dec 3, 2025	CLE	25	5	13	2	0	1	5.8	2	8	25.0%	0	1	0.0%	1	2	50.0%	4	9	2	2	+2
Dec 2, 2025	TOR	21	11	11	1	0	0	11.8	4	8	50.0%	0	2	0.0%	3	3	100.0%	3	8	1	0	-7
Nov 26, 2025	SAS	26	9	11	1	0	1	10.9	3	8	37.5%	0	0	—	3	4	75.0%	6	5	0	1	-9
Nov 24, 2025	MIL	27	14	11	4	1	1	17.8	5	8	62.5%	2	4	50.0%	2	3	66.7%	2	9	1	1	+14
Nov 23, 2025	OKC	20	8	8	2	0	2	7.7	2	5	40.0%	2	4	50.0%	2	4	50.0%	2	6	2	5	+2
Nov 21, 2025	GSW	27	22	10	4	2	0	24.0	9	14	64.3%	1	4	25.0%	3	4	75.0%	5	5	0	3	-2
Nov 19, 2025	CHI	34	17	21	4	1	2	24.6	7	13	53.8%	1	3	33.3%	2	3	66.7%	10	11	0	3	+8
Nov 18, 2025	PHX	23	9	12	2	0	5	14.7	3	8	37.5%	0	0	—	3	3	100.0%	7	5	2	1	-15
Nov 16, 2025	DAL	28	16	11	2	0	2	18.0	6	11	54.5%	2	6	33.3%	2	2	100.0%	7	4	0	4	-9
Nov 14, 2025	HOU	24	9	8	0	0	0	8.3	4	9	44.4%	0	3	0.0%	1	1	100.0%	6	2	1	1	-10
Nov 12, 2025	NOP	27	9	10	0	0	3	8.2	4	9	44.4%	0	4	0.0%	1	1	100.0%	3	7	3	3	+12
Nov 10, 2025	ORL	29	2	9	0	0	0	1.2	1	5	20.0%	0	2	0.0%	0	0	—	2	7	0	3	-4
Nov 8, 2025	MIA	21	13	7	0	2	2	15.0	6	9	66.7%	1	3	33.3%	0	0	—	5	2	0	4	+5
Nov 5, 2025	OKC	25	7	8	0	2	2	7.9	2	7	28.6%	1	4	25.0%	2	2	100.0%	2	6	1	3	+1
Nov 3, 2025	LAL	18	2	4	0	0	1	2.6	1	3	33.3%	0	1	0.0%	0	0	—	3	1	0	2	-7
Oct 31, 2025	DEN	24	5	15	1	0	0	7.4	2	8	25.0%	0	3	0.0%	1	1	100.0%	7	8	0	2	-4
Oct 29, 2025	UTA	28	5	7	4	1	3	9.2	2	6	33.3%	0	2	0.0%	1	2	50.0%	4	3	0	4	-1
Oct 27, 2025	LAL	26	16	14	2	1	2	20.0	8	12	66.7%	0	3	0.0%	0	0	—	7	7	2	2	+21
Oct 26, 2025	LAC	24	9	10	3	1	1	14.4	3	6	50.0%	1	3	33.3%	2	2	100.0%	6	4	1	1	-2
Oct 24, 2025	GSW	22	14	8	2	0	1	15.9	4	6	66.7%	1	2	50.0%	5	5	100.0%	4	4	0	4	+2
Oct 22, 2025	MIN	30	8	6	1	2	1	10.1	3	5	60.0%	2	4	50.0%	0	0	—	2	4	1	3	-2

Scouting Report

Stat	Value
TS%	60.6%	76
SQ	23.3	7
FTr	32.5%	77
3PAr	31.7%	28
ORB	2.9	97
cTOV	8.5%	52
Load	22.6	29
Creation	1.9	32
Portability	2.6	27
Passer Rating	33.3	61
CraftedOPM	-0.3	61

Stat	Value
Deflections	2.7	59
raDTOV	0	51
DRB	1.1	89
Rim Defense	-8.5	89
Rim Frequency	34.5	33
BLKpct	5.8	97
Versatility	8.3	13
rPF	1.2	15
CraftedDPM	2	94

*hover or click any stat for a detailed description.

*This scouting report combines the player's last two seasons of performance, with greater emphasis on the most recent 1095 minutes played during the 2025-26 season. Compared to all other players who played over 48 minutes.

Similar Players

Compare to Another Player

offense

	Player	Score
1	Trayce Jackson-Davis	88
2	Goga Bitadze	87
3	Jake LaRavia	86
4	Jakob Poeltl	86
5	Marvin Bagley III	86
6	Christian Braun	85
7	Jock Landale	85
8	Kevon Looney	85
9	Neemias Queta	85
10	Wendell Carter Jr.	85

defense

	Player	Score
1	Jaylin Williams	89
2	Kevon Looney	89
3	Isaiah Hartenstein	88
4	Robert Williams III	88
5	Draymond Green	87
6	Jaren Jackson Jr.	86
7	Jaxson Hayes	86
8	Mouhamed Gueye	86
9	Anthony Davis	85
10	Dereck Lively II	83

overall

	Player	Score
1	Isaiah Hartenstein	87
2	Kevon Looney	87
3	Goga Bitadze	86
4	Marvin Bagley III	85
5	Jakob Poeltl	84
6	Neemias Queta	84
7	Wendell Carter Jr.	84
8	Robert Williams III	83
9	Rudy Gobert	83
10	Trayce Jackson-Davis	83

*Similarity Score | The difference between the percentile scores of this player and that of all other players in his position group (guards, wings, forwards, bigs). Converted to a 1-100 scale where 100 is most similar, and 1 is least similar.