The Kings .
| Player | Pos | Age | GP | MIN ↓ | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FGM | FGA | FG% | 3PM | 3PA | 3P% | FTM | FTA | FT% | ORB | DRB | TOV | PF | CPM | OPM | DPM | WARP | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PF | 25 | 23 | 34.5 | 14.0 | 5.7 | 1.7 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 5.5 | 13.0 | 42.0% | 1.3 | 4.9 | 26.5% | 1.7 | 2.1 | 77.6% | 1.4 | 4.3 | 1.2 | 1.8 | -0.2 | -0.9 | +0.7 | 0.9 | OUT | |
| SF | 36 | 74 | 31.6 | 18.5 | 3.0 | 4.1 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 6.5 | 13.1 | 49.5% | 0.6 | 1.9 | 31.6% | 4.9 | 5.7 | 86.4% | 0.5 | 2.6 | 1.3 | 2.0 | -1.2 | +0.7 | -1.9 | 1.3 | DAY | |
| SG | 30 | 39 | 31.4 | 19.2 | 2.8 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 6.7 | 14.0 | 47.9% | 2.5 | 6.5 | 38.5% | 3.2 | 3.6 | 88.0% | 0.2 | 2.6 | 1.9 | 2.1 | -2.0 | +0.6 | -2.6 | 0.2 | OUT | |
| C | 29 | 19 | 29.7 | 15.8 | 11.4 | 4.1 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 6.3 | 11.6 | 54.3% | 0.3 | 1.4 | 21.4% | 2.9 | 4.1 | 72.7% | 3.4 | 8.0 | 2.7 | 3.5 | +0.2 | +0.4 | -0.3 | 0.7 | OUT | |
| PG | 37 | 64 | 28.9 | 15.2 | 5.4 | 6.7 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 5.6 | 13.1 | 42.7% | 2.0 | 5.9 | 33.9% | 2.0 | 2.9 | 69.4% | 1.3 | 4.2 | 3.3 | 2.3 | -2.4 | -0.4 | -2.0 | -0.1 | OUT | |
| SF | 28 | 45 | 26.1 | 13.7 | 4.1 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 4.6 | 11.1 | 41.5% | 1.7 | 5.5 | 30.9% | 2.8 | 3.2 | 86.7% | 0.7 | 3.4 | 1.7 | 2.5 | -1.4 | -0.2 | -1.2 | 0.6 | OUT | |
| C | 22 | 67 | 26.0 | 12.0 | 7.3 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 5.0 | 8.9 | 56.8% | 0.3 | 0.9 | 33.3% | 1.6 | 2.0 | 78.8% | 1.9 | 5.4 | 1.2 | 2.3 | -2.5 | -2.0 | -0.5 | -0.1 | Active | |
| SG | 27 | 25 | 25.8 | 10.4 | 3.1 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 3.7 | 8.4 | 43.8% | 1.9 | 5.4 | 35.2% | 1.2 | 1.4 | 82.9% | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 2.4 | -2.7 | -1.6 | -1.1 | -0.1 | Active | |
| SF | 23 | 68 | 23.9 | 7.7 | 3.6 | 2.2 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 3.0 | 7.4 | 40.2% | 1.0 | 2.9 | 34.5% | 0.8 | 1.1 | 69.2% | 0.9 | 2.7 | 1.4 | 2.1 | -1.7 | -2.0 | +0.3 | 0.5 | Active | |
| PF | 26 | 66 | 23.2 | 9.5 | 6.5 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 4.1 | 7.7 | 53.5% | 0.4 | 1.3 | 30.8% | 0.9 | 1.6 | 57.5% | 2.3 | 4.3 | 0.8 | 1.7 | -1.1 | -1.5 | +0.4 | 0.9 | Active | |
| SG | 27 | 58 | 22.4 | 12.6 | 1.9 | 3.1 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 4.5 | 10.5 | 43.2% | 2.0 | 5.2 | 38.5% | 1.6 | 1.8 | 88.3% | 0.3 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 1.7 | -1.3 | +0.3 | -1.6 | 0.6 | DAY | |
| C | 24 | 37 | 20.5 | 5.1 | 7.6 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 1.3 | 2.2 | 3.9 | 56.9% | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | 0.7 | 1.3 | 53.1% | 3.3 | 4.4 | 0.8 | 3.5 | -0.3 | -2.1 | +1.8 | 0.7 | Active | |
| PG | 24 | 16 | 16.4 | 5.1 | 2.4 | 3.3 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.9 | 5.8 | 32.3% | 0.8 | 2.7 | 29.6% | 0.6 | 0.6 | 90.0% | 0.1 | 2.3 | 1.1 | 1.6 | -1.5 | -1.3 | -0.2 | 0.1 | Active | |
| SG | 23 | 31 | 15.8 | 7.5 | 2.7 | 2.2 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 2.7 | 6.7 | 40.1% | 0.6 | 2.6 | 23.1% | 1.6 | 2.0 | 79.0% | 0.7 | 1.9 | 1.3 | 1.2 | -0.7 | -0.9 | +0.3 | 0.3 | Active | |
| PG | 25 | 3 | 14.3 | 3.3 | 1.0 | 3.3 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.3 | 42.9% | 0.0 | 0.3 | - | 1.3 | 1.3 | 100.0% | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.7 | -1.1 | -0.5 | -0.5 | 0.0 | OUT | |
| SF | 34 | 22 | 14.0 | 5.3 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 1.8 | 4.4 | 41.7% | 1.6 | 4.0 | 40.0% | 0.1 | 0.1 | 100.0% | 0.2 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.7 | -3.0 | -1.4 | -1.6 | -0.1 | Active | |
| C | 28 | 42 | 13.1 | 5.2 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 2.2 | 3.7 | 59.6% | 0.0 | 0.2 | - | 0.8 | 1.4 | 56.1% | 0.9 | 2.1 | 0.7 | 1.4 | -2.2 | -2.5 | +0.4 | 0.1 | OUT | |
| PF | 23 | 9 | 11.4 | 3.7 | 2.6 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 3.0 | 40.7% | 0.7 | 1.6 | 43.7% | 0.6 | 0.8 | 71.4% | 1.3 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 1.7 | -0.7 | -0.7 | 0.0 | 0.1 | Active | |
| Team Totals | 74 | 409.0 | 183.8 | 75.1 | 41.7 | 13.9 | 7.8 | 68.5 | 148.6 | 46.1% | 17.7 | 53.2 | 33.3% | 29.3 | 37.0 | 79.2% | 21.1 | 54.3 | 23.2 | 35.2 | — | — | — | 6.6 |
Stats for rostered Sacramento Kings players who have played with the affiliate this season.
View all rostered players’ G League stats →
| Player | Age | GP | MIN | PTS ↓ | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FGM | FGA | FG% | 3PM | 3PA | 3P% | FTM | FTA | FT% | OREB | DREB | TOV | PF | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Devin Carter | 24 | 5 | 33.0 | 23.2 | 8 | 4 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 8.2 | 19.8 | 41.4% | 2.6 | 8.6 | 30.2% | 2.6 | 3.4 | 76.5% | 2.2 | 5.8 | 2.4 | 1.4 | +7 |
| Killian Hayes | 24 | 28 | 31.8 | 23.1 | 3.9 | 8.2 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 8.8 | 18.7 | 46.8% | 2.3 | 7 | 32.5% | 2.1 | 2.7 | 80.0% | 0.8 | 3.1 | 2.8 | 2.2 | +5.4 |
| Patrick Baldwin Jr. | 23 | 32 | 33.6 | 21.3 | 7.6 | 2.6 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 8.3 | 16 | 51.9% | 1.8 | 5.3 | 33.3% | 1.9 | 2.9 | 64.5% | 1.6 | 6 | 2.2 | 2.4 | -2.8 |
| Daeqwon Plowden | 27 | 29 | 36.3 | 21 | 6.1 | 2.5 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 7.1 | 15 | 47.4% | 2.9 | 7.3 | 40.1% | 2.2 | 2.7 | 83.3% | 1.6 | 4.4 | 2.3 | 2.6 | +6.2 |
| Maxime Raynaud | 22 | 1 | 37.2 | 18 | 15 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 15 | 53.3% | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 100.0% | 2 | 13 | 2 | 4 | +1 |
| Nique Clifford | 24 | 1 | 32.5 | 16 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 13 | 46.2% | 1 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 2 | 100.0% | 1 | 7 | 5 | 4 | +9 |
| Isaiah Stevens | 25 | 33 | 33.6 | 14.6 | 3.4 | 8.5 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 5.5 | 11.8 | 47.0% | 1.1 | 3.6 | 29.2% | 1.6 | 1.9 | 85.5% | 0.5 | 2.8 | 2.6 | 2.2 | +2.2 |
| Dylan Cardwell | 24 | 16 | 29.1 | 10.2 | 12.8 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 4.8 | 7.9 | 60.3% | 0 | 0.1 | 0.0% | 0.5 | 1.2 | 42.1% | 4.4 | 8.3 | 2.4 | 3.6 | +8.6 |
Stabilized Net Rating — All ratings below blend raw on-court results with expected performance (based on team strength and player impact) to reduce noise from small samples. The more minutes a group plays together, the more we trust the raw numbers.
Actual Lineups - Top 5-man combinations by minutes played this season, with real offensive/defensive ratings. Net shown is Stabilized (see above). Min cutoff: 75+ min. Does not include players with limited or no minutes (e.g. injured, recent trades). View all lineups →
Player tiers based on CraftedPM impact metrics
The Sacramento Kings lack star power at the top of the roster. Their depth is solid with 8 rotation-caliber players.
Solid rebounder
Dominant rebounder. Solid rotation piece.
Versatile wing
Elite shooter
Solid rebounder
The Sacramento Kings have significant challenges on offense, ranking among the bottom 5 teams in scoring. They struggle with shooting efficiency, ranking below the league average.
The Kings have significant challenges on defense, ranking among the bottom 5 teams. They struggle to contest shots effectively, allowing higher shooting percentages. Their defensive shot quality is among the best in the league.