Indiana Pacers
The Pacers .
Team Stats & Four Factors
Quick Stats
OFF Four Factors (Offense)
DEF Four Factors (Defense)
Last 10 Games Trend
Schedule & Results
Roster
| Player | Pos | Age | GP | MIN ↓ | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FGM | FGA | FG% | 3PM | 3PA | 3P% | FTM | FTA | FT% | ORB | DRB | TOV | PF | CPM | OPM | DPM | WARP | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PF | 31 | 59 | 33.4 | 23.7 | 6.6 | 3.8 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 8.9 | 18.5 | 48.0% | 1.7 | 4.7 | 36.2% | 4.3 | 6.2 | 69.1% | 1.4 | 5.2 | 2.2 | 2.4 | +2.1 | +1.9 | +0.2 | 4.2 | Active | |
| PG | 26 | 56 | 31.2 | 17.0 | 2.8 | 7.6 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 5.8 | 13.2 | 44.1% | 1.9 | 5.2 | 36.5% | 3.4 | 4.2 | 82.4% | 0.4 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.2 | -0.4 | +0.6 | -1.0 | 1.6 | Active | |
| C | 28 | 48 | 30.1 | 14.1 | 10.6 | 2.2 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 6.0 | 10.0 | 59.8% | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | 2.1 | 3.0 | 71.1% | 3.4 | 7.2 | 1.8 | 2.3 | +1.6 | 0.0 | +1.7 | 2.9 | OUT | |
| SF | 26 | 45 | 29.7 | 13.8 | 4.2 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 4.7 | 11.4 | 41.4% | 2.3 | 6.2 | 37.1% | 2.0 | 2.5 | 82.9% | 1.1 | 3.1 | 1.4 | 2.8 | -0.1 | +0.1 | -0.3 | 1.4 | DAY | |
| PF | 22 | 73 | 25.6 | 11.5 | 5.1 | 2.4 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 4.0 | 9.5 | 42.1% | 1.7 | 4.6 | 37.0% | 1.8 | 2.4 | 75.3% | 0.6 | 4.5 | 1.8 | 1.7 | -2.7 | -1.7 | -1.0 | -0.3 | DAY | |
| SG | 24 | 62 | 21.3 | 7.0 | 3.0 | 1.7 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 2.5 | 5.9 | 43.3% | 1.3 | 3.6 | 36.1% | 0.6 | 0.8 | 75.5% | 0.7 | 2.3 | 0.6 | 1.8 | -2.3 | -1.4 | -0.9 | 0.1 | Active | |
| C | 27 | 74 | 20.9 | 9.4 | 3.8 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 1.8 | 3.5 | 7.3 | 47.2% | 1.4 | 4.6 | 30.4% | 1.0 | 1.3 | 81.9% | 0.9 | 2.9 | 0.9 | 2.4 | -0.3 | -1.3 | +1.0 | 1.5 | Active | |
| C | 27 | 39 | 18.6 | 8.9 | 4.4 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 2.9 | 5.7 | 50.2% | 1.4 | 3.3 | 42.4% | 1.8 | 2.1 | 87.5% | 1.1 | 3.3 | 0.8 | 1.7 | -1.4 | -0.9 | -0.6 | 0.3 | Active | |
| SF | 21 | 35 | 18.4 | 5.1 | 4.4 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 2.0 | 4.3 | 47.0% | 0.7 | 2.0 | 35.0% | 0.5 | 1.0 | 48.6% | 0.9 | 3.5 | 0.8 | 1.9 | -1.1 | -2.0 | +0.9 | 0.4 | OUT | |
| PF | 27 | 16 | 17.3 | 10.1 | 4.3 | 2.2 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 3.7 | 7.4 | 49.6% | 1.3 | 4.3 | 30.2% | 1.4 | 1.6 | 84.6% | 0.6 | 3.7 | 1.3 | 1.4 | -0.9 | +0.6 | -1.5 | 0.1 | Active | |
| PG | 33 | 55 | 17.2 | 9.3 | 2.2 | 5.1 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 4.3 | 8.0 | 53.4% | 0.3 | 0.9 | 33.3% | 0.4 | 0.5 | 85.7% | 0.4 | 1.8 | 1.1 | 1.1 | -0.1 | +0.1 | -0.2 | 1.0 | Active | |
| PG | 27 | 41 | 17.0 | 8.3 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 2.8 | 6.0 | 46.7% | 0.9 | 2.3 | 39.1% | 1.8 | 2.2 | 81.5% | 0.6 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 1.6 | -0.8 | -0.9 | 0.0 | 0.5 | Active | |
| PG | 23 | 30 | 15.4 | 4.1 | 1.4 | 2.7 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 4.1 | 41.5% | 0.6 | 1.8 | 33.3% | 0.1 | 0.3 | 50.0% | 0.3 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 1.0 | -2.8 | -2.1 | -0.7 | -0.1 | Active | |
| PF | 26 | 54 | 14.0 | 4.9 | 2.6 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 1.7 | 3.9 | 44.7% | 0.7 | 2.0 | 35.0% | 0.8 | 0.9 | 80.4% | 1.0 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 1.1 | -1.7 | -1.2 | -0.5 | 0.2 | Active | |
| SG | 29 | 15 | 13.1 | 5.2 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 1.4 | 3.5 | 40.4% | 1.1 | 3.1 | 35.5% | 1.3 | 1.5 | 82.6% | 0.1 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.3 | -1.0 | -0.7 | -0.3 | 0.1 | Active | |
| SG | 23 | 31 | 11.2 | 3.9 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 3.6 | 37.5% | 1.0 | 3.1 | 32.3% | 0.2 | 0.4 | 53.8% | 0.2 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 0.7 | -2.7 | -1.9 | -0.8 | -0.1 | Active | |
| C | 28 | 29 | 10.7 | 3.9 | 2.6 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 1.6 | 2.8 | 56.3% | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | 0.8 | 1.1 | 72.7% | 1.6 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 1.9 | -1.3 | -1.3 | +0.1 | 0.2 | Active | |
| PG | 25 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | +4.4 | +4.5 | -0.1 | 0.0 | OUT | |
| Team Totals | 74 | 345.1 | 160.2 | 62.7 | 39.2 | 9.8 | 5.7 | 58.9 | 125.1 | 47.1% | 18.3 | 51.7 | 35.4% | 24.3 | 32.0 | 75.9% | 15.3 | 47.5 | 19.2 | 29.3 | — | — | — | 14.0 |
G League (on assignment)
Stats for rostered Indiana Pacers players who have played with the affiliate this season.
View all rostered players’ G League stats →
| Player | Age | GP | MIN | PTS ↓ | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FGM | FGA | FG% | 3PM | 3PA | 3P% | FTM | FTA | FT% | OREB | DREB | TOV | PF | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quenton Jackson | 27 | 2 | 22.3 | 18.5 | 3.5 | 6.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 5.5 | 13 | 42.3% | 2 | 4.5 | 44.4% | 3.5 | 3.5 | 100.0% | 1 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | +14.5 |
| Kobe Brown | 26 | 2 | 32.7 | 16.5 | 8.5 | 3.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 4 | 11.5 | 34.8% | 1.5 | 4.5 | 33.3% | 4.5 | 4.5 | 100.0% | 2.5 | 6 | 2.5 | 3 | -10 |
| Micah Potter | 27 | 13 | 32.3 | 15.6 | 9.5 | 2.4 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 5.4 | 11.3 | 47.6% | 1.8 | 4.7 | 37.7% | 2 | 2.5 | 81.3% | 2.6 | 6.8 | 2.9 | 2.9 | +8.1 |
| Taelon Peter | 24 | 20 | 32.5 | 14.9 | 5.2 | 3.8 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 4.9 | 11.7 | 41.5% | 3.1 | 8.6 | 36.3% | 1.3 | 1.5 | 83.3% | 0.4 | 4.8 | 1.7 | 2.4 | +0.5 |
| Kam Jones | 24 | 7 | 29.4 | 13.3 | 4.4 | 6.7 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 5.6 | 12.6 | 44.3% | 1 | 3.4 | 29.2% | 0.6 | 0.9 | 66.7% | 1 | 3.4 | 3 | 1.7 | +10.7 |
Lineup Analysis
Stabilized Net Rating — All ratings below blend raw on-court results with expected performance (based on team strength and player impact) to reduce noise from small samples. The more minutes a group plays together, the more we trust the raw numbers.
Best groups(2–4 man, 200+ min)
Worst groups(2–4 man, 200+ min)
Actual Lineups - Top 5-man combinations by minutes played this season, with real offensive/defensive ratings. Net shown is Stabilized (see above). Min cutoff: 75+ min. Does not include players with limited or no minutes (e.g. injured, recent trades). View all lineups →
No 5-man lineup data for this team yet this season.
Talent Breakdown
Player tiers based on CraftedPM impact metrics
The Indiana Pacers lack star power at the top of the roster. Their depth is solid with 9 rotation-caliber players.
Team Identity & Analysis
Key Players
Strong offensive contributor with solid rebounding. Strong positive impact.
Dominant rebounder with strong defense. Solid rotation piece.
Strong shooter
Strong playmaker
Elite offensive engine. Elite-level impact.
Offensive Identity
The Indiana Pacers have significant challenges on offense, ranking among the bottom 5 teams in scoring. They struggle with shooting efficiency, ranking below the league average.
Defensive Identity
The Pacers have significant challenges on defense, ranking among the bottom 5 teams. They struggle to contest shots effectively, allowing higher shooting percentages and frequently send opponents to the free throw line.